Monday, May 14, 2012

Genocide:A Gravest Crime Against Humanity Under International Humanitarian Law

Published in Orient Journal of Law and Social Sciences[ ISSN 0973-7480] Volume VI ,Issue-April 2012 ;Page -102-106: 


Genocide:A Gravest Crime Against Humanity Under International Humanitarian Law*


“Laws are silent amidst of the clash of arms” –Cicero 

The raw violence is result of power struggle, domination over the territory and false perception of superiority of race or ethnic community or religious community ,the history has witnessed many wars ,armed conflicts  and mass killing without  showing any mercy, killings not only include armed people but also non-armed people.


The history witnessed mass butchery of tribals,,ethnic and religious groups and  no mercy shown on women and children, which resulted in adoption of various conventions and treaties ,which called for codification of the  rules and laws relating to the laws of warfare and human rights.    

The Genocide is  regarded as crime against humanity under international law ,but also uncivilsed act in civilsed world ,moreover against the spirit of U.N charter as well as Universal Declarations of Human rights. The Genocide means systematic mass killings or ethnic cleansing of group during armed or non- armed conflicts.

Definitions: 

There is no universal accepted definition of the word ‘genocide’, there is no single definition to say what constitute genocide? It is apt to discuss several definitions for broader understanding of the word ‘Genocide’ "The deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group "[1]  The Genocide is defined as "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group" [2]The word Genocide derived from the  Greek word “genos”, for race or tribe, and the suffix “cide” from the Latin for “to kill" [3]

The term "genocide" did not exist before 1944.It is a very specific term, referring to violent crimes committed against groups with the intent to destroy the existence of the group.It is a gross violation of Human rights, as laid out in the U.S. Bill of Rights or the 1948 ,United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which concern the rights of individuals.


The word ‘genocide’ was first defined by Raphael Lemkin' , Lemkin's idea of genocide as an offense against International Law was widely accepted by the international community and was one of the legal bases of the Nuremberg Trials.


 Chalk and Jonassohn opined : "Genocide is a form of one-sided mass killing in which a state or other authority intends to destroy a group so defined by the perpetrator”[4] "The term Holocaust", means  the mass murder of Jews under the German Nazi regime in World War II.[5]

The International Legal Definition:

United Nations General Assembly[1946] Resolution 96 (I) (11 December) therefore, affirms that genocide is a crime under international law .whether the crime is committed on religious, racial, political or any other grounds."The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. (CPPCG) was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 9 December 1948 and came into effect on 12 January 1951 (Resolution 260 (III))[6]. "Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group"
Article II describes two elements to constitute the  crime of genocide:[7]

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such",  and 2) The physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide." Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity. This definition has been criticized by many scholars and experts on the ground that it eliminated political and social groups.
M. Hassan Kakar in his book “The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979-1982 says that the international definition of genocide is too restricted[8]

History of Genocide:The Old Testament describes the genocides of Amalekites and Midianite, Genghis Khan of mongol is Known for killing boys and men of captured cities and also kidnapping the woman and girls. 


Christopher Columbus landed on American soil in 1890,which  lead to massacre of Sioux at Wounded Knee by the United States military on December 29, 1890[9], there were several instances of destruction of American aborigines.


The Armenian Genocide: Armenian genocide during world war -I during Ottoman Empire. Armenian deaths is between 1 million and 1.5 million in the year 1915.It is regarded as first modern genocide in the world.


Nazi Genocide of Jews: One of the prominent genocide case was Jews prosecution during Second World War [1933-45:], It is estimated that six million Jewish men, women and children were systematically murdered in extermination or "death" camps located in Eastern Europe .by Nazi army led by  Adolf Hitler, which became subject of debate as a war crime during second world war. Nuremberg &Tokyo tribunals were formed to prosecute war criminals during Second World War holocaust. 


Partition of India & Pakistan: During Partition of India in the year 1947, millions of Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs were slaughtered or disappeared for being on the wrong side of the newly formed border.


Bangladesh Liberation war :The Guinness Book of Records lists the atrocities by General Agha Mohammed Yahya Khan of Pakistan on Bengali intellectual, cultural, and political elite in East Pakistan(now known as Bangladesh) during Bangladesh Liberation war, in the year  1971 as one of the top 5 genocides in the 20th century.


Sikhs in India: Hundreds of Sikhs died during army operations, while tackling separatist agitation and mass killing of Sikhs aftermath of assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi  [then Prime Minster of India] in 1984. 


Bosnia & Herzegovina[Yugoslavia]:In 2001, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) was formed  to investigate crime against humanity in Bosnia and Herzegovina and it delivered its first conviction for the crime of genocide, against General Krstić for his role in the 1995 Srebrenica Genocide. It is estimated that civil war killed people at around 100,000–110,000 and most devastating conflict after world war –II


Rwandan Genocide:In ,1994 mass murder of an estimated 800000 people were reported in small East African nation of Rwanda. [Hutu –Tutsi conflict]The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is a court under supervision of the United Nations for the prosecution of offenses like genocide committed in Rwanda occurred there during April and May, 1994, it is stated that ICTR has convicted 57 accused persons.


Darfur Genocide:In February 2003, when the Sudan Liberation Movement/Army (SLM/A) and Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) groups in Darfur took up arms, accusing the Sudanese government of oppressing non-Arab Sudanese in favor of Sudanese Arabs.
In January 2005, an International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur, authorized by UN Security Council Resolution 1564 of 2004, to investigate the crimes against humanity and war crimes that have been committed in Darfur in Sudanese civil war.
Chechenian deportation :On February 26 2004 ,the plenary assembly of the European Parliament recognized the deportation of Chechen people during Operation Lentil (23 February 1944), as an act of genocide, on the basis of the 1907 ,two Hague Conventions on laws of war.


East Timor conflict : UN report states that the Indonesian military used starvation as a weapon to exterminate the East Timorese, along with Napalm and chemical weapons, which poisoned the food and water supply. Between 1975 &1999, there were an estimated 102,800 conflict-related deaths (approximately 18,600 killings and 84,200 'excess' deaths from hunger and illness), the majority of which occurred during the Indonesian occupation.


Ethiopian rule :Amnesty International estimates that up to 500,000 people were killed during the Ethiopian Red Terror lead by former Soviet-backed Marxist dictator Mengistu Haile Mariam. The Eritrean–Ethiopian War took place from May 1998 to June 2000.


Cambodia:In Cambodia,  the Khmer Rouge, led by Pol Pot, Ta Mok and other leaders, organized the mass killing of ideologically suspect groups, ethnic minorities like the ethnic Vietnamese, Chinese[1975-1979]


Sri Lankan Tamils: Recently ,In Sri Lankan Tamil conflict ,hundreds of minority Tamils were disappeared or killed by Sri Lankan army. On 22nd March ,2012,,the U.N Human Right Council (UNHRC) passed  a resolution  condemning mass killings[40,000],&human rights violations by the Sri Lankan Army in the name of fighting terrorist outfit LTTE.India is among 24 countries ,which voted against Sri Lanka and in favour of  resolution.


Gujarat Violence in India: There were communal riots in 2001, hundreds of minority Muslims were targeted ,after train bogey was burn down at Godhra station,Gujarat.The issue of Gujarat riots has reached Hon’ble Supreme Court of India for impartial inquiry as allegations of failure of state machinery surfaced. during riots.


Formation of International Criminal Court: 


The International Criminal Court[10] was formed under Rome statue, 1998. The Rome Statute entered into force on 1 July 2002 after ratification by 60 countries .The ICC can only prosecute war crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002.. The ICC is an independent international organisation, and is not part of the United Nations system. The Court publicly indicted 28 people, proceedings against 23 of whom are ongoing.[as reported in Wikipedia]

Mrs.Mary Robinson of UNHCR said “A strong permanent international criminal court will send out a powerful message of deterrence to all those in positions of power and leadership that they can no longer use terror tactics, systematic rape, ethnic cleansing, mutilation and indiscriminate killing of non-combatants as weapons of war or for any other purpose”[11]

Conclusion: 


The Genocide is most heinous crime war against humanity during armed or non –armed conflict. The individual was not a part of International law or Law of nations, there was no legal protection for offences against humanity, but after individual became a part of International Law, there was perceptible change in the outlook of international community in fighting crimes against humanity. 


The special war tribunals were set up for prosecuting war criminals after second world war ,the major development of International Humanitarian Law occurred with adoption of four Geneva conventions of 1949, which came into effect on 1950 and two additional protocols of 1977, The International Humanitarian law is regarded as an integral part of Human Rights law. The International Humanitarian law includes two components one is law of warfare and another is human rights law.


Another major development in International law is state terrorism and state torture,now it is regarded as international crime under International Law, the U.N declarations on Torture in 1975 condemned the state torture, it violates Article 7 of International Covenant on civil and political rights, 1966., which came into effect in the year 1976, which clearly prohibit torture as instrument of oppression by the state.


The International criminal court was formed after Rome statue enacted, the ‘genocide’ is recognized as war crime and perpetuators are liable to be prosecuted under ICC charter. 

Foot notes:

*Author is Practicing Advocate at A.P High Court,Hyderabad &worked for A.P Women's Commission,Hyderabad.

[1]Funk, T. Marcus (2010). Victims' Rights and Advocacy at the International Criminal Court. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide

[3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide#Lemkin

[4]Frank Chalk, Kurt Jonassohn The History and Sociology of Genocide: Analyses and Case Studies, Yale University Press, 1990,

[5]Compact Oxford English Dictionary,1991
 
[6]http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/ha/cppcg/cppcg.html
  [7] http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext.htm

 [8]M. Hassan Kakar :The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979-1982 University of California press , 1995 The Regents of the University of California.

 [9]Massacre At Wounded Knee, 1890," EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (1998).

 [10]http://www.icc-cpi.int/Menus/ICC/About+the+Court/

 [11]Address by Mary Robinson ,15 june 1998,http:// www.un.ord/icc/speeches/robinson.htm.

References:


1.Charlotte Lindsey: Women facing war-ICRC study on the impact of armed conflict on women ,ICRC,Geneva ,October 2001

2.Compact Oxford English Dictionary,1991


3.Funk, T. Marcus (2010). Victims' Rights and Advocacy at the International Criminal Court. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.


4.J.G Stark: Introduction to International Law ,Butterworth &co [Publishers]Ltd 1999.[Indian edition].


5.M. Hassan Kakar :The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979-1982 University of California press , 1995 The Regents of the University of California


6.M.K Balachndran &Rose Varghese[editors]:Introduction of International Humanitarian Law ,ICRC,New Delhi 1999


Weblinks :
 

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide#Lemkin 
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history 
  4. http://www.un.org/news/ 
  5. http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext.htm 
  6. www.eyewitnesstohistory.com
  7. http://www.icc-cpi.int/Menus/ICC
  8. http://www.amnesty.org/

@All Rights Reserved
………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Friday, May 4, 2012

Hindu Marriage&Judicial Remedies

Hindu Marriage&Judicial Remedies :


  • According to Hindu Philosophy the marriage is holy and permanent union 
  • There is no provision of divorce in ancient Hindu law as marriage is regarded as scared union because it performed by chanting holy mantras.
  • After codification of Hindu Law, the ancient Hindu Law assumed secular character ,more over the elements of contractual obligations were added in the concept of Hindu marriage,which is otherwise scared union. 
Judicial Remedies includes:
  1. Restitution of conjugal rights
  2. Judicial separation 
  3. Divorce
  4. Maintenance  /permanent alimony

According section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act ,1955 grounds for divorce includes:
  1. Adultery
  2. Cruelty
  3. Desertion
  4. Conversion
  5. Insanity
  6. Leprosy
  7. Venereal disease
  8. Renouncing the world
  9. Unheard for seven years or more
Special grounds for wife :
  1. Bigamy
  2. Rape,sodomy&bestiality
  3. Maintenance decreed to wife -husband not paying the same -ground for divorce,non resumption despite restitution of conjugal rights or judicial separation.
  4. Repudiation of marriage by wife.
  • Break down theory
  • Mutual  consent divorce



References :
Hindu Marriage Act ,1955.


Monday, April 23, 2012

Essential Ceremonies&Customary Rites in Hindu Marriage:

Essential Ceremonies&Customary Rites in Hindu Marriage:


The Marriage celebrations is a huge occasion among Hindu families with presence of relatives ,friends and Vedic pundits to perform marriage according to Vedic rites&rituals. 

  • Marriage is a union between a male and a female with a commitment to pursue Dharma,Artha-possessions,Kama -physical&other desires&Moksha -the liberation together.
  • Types of Marriages:Brahma,Daiva Arsha,Prajapatya , Gandharva Asura,Rakshasa,Paishacha-Manu Smrti III.20-34
  • There is no uniformity of following ceremonies,rites,rituals or customs in Hindu marriages , neither,there is strict rules in Hindu law to be followed for solemnizing marriage nor there is consensus among pundits about essential ceremonies to be followed by Hindu couples.

  • Most customs,rites or rituals or ceremonies are followed by Hindu's, since time immemorial.Most ceremonies like Homa,Mangalsutra  dharan and Saptapadi  are followed by Hindu's  since Rig veda.
  • The customs or rituals vary from region to region or caste or family.

  • In some caste, marriage is performed at Bride Groom place or in some caste, marriage is performed at Bride 's place.

  • There is no mention of dowry in any texts,but some gifts were given by bride family for starting new married life as matter of custom /usage

Some Ceremonies commonly observed in most Hindu marriages :

  • Welcoming  Bride Groom/Barat with Arthi
  • Sankalpa
  • Ganapathi Puja [Ganesh prayers ]
  • Kannyadaan
  • Akshatropanam 
  • Mangalsutrabandhanam 
  • Paani Grahanam
  • Laja Homa 
  • Agni Pradakshina
  • Saptapadi
  • Arundhati darshanam
  • Nishekam

Dravidian marriage or South Indian marriage :



  • Nichayathartham[Engagement ceremony or exchange of rings,reading out lagna patrika  ]


  • Varapuja-edurukolu[Welcoming ceremony]


  • Kasi yatra

  • Ankurarpanam

  • Gowri Pooja by bride

  • Sankalpam 

  • kanyadanam

  • Sumuhoortam

  • Mangalya dharana -Tying 3 knots

  • Talambralu -Rice shower

  • Sadasyam Nagavelli

  • Saptapadi- 7 steps before holy fire

    • Step 1-May the first step lead to food that is both nourishing and pure.


    • Step 2 -May the second step lead to strength (at the physical, emotional, intellectual &spiritual levels).


    • Step -3-May the third step lead to prosperity.
    • Step-4-May the fourth step lead to all round happiness.


    • Step-5-May the fifth step lead to progeny (noble & virtuous children).


    • Step -6-May the sixth step lead to long life.


    • Step-7-May the seventh step lead to bondage (through harmony).

  • Laja homam

  • Arundhati darshanam-Meditating on the Pole star & the Arundhati star.

  • Mangala harati

  • Grihapravesham-House warming ceremony


  • Satyanarayana vratam -Puja

  • Nishekam

Essential Ceremonies under Codified Hindu Law  :


In Hindu marriage Act ,1955 there is no set of prescribed ceremonies for solemnizing marriage,section-7,expressly provides how marriage to be solemnized;

"1.A Hindu Marriage may be solemnised in accordance with the customary rites and ceremonies of either party thereto.

2.Where such rites and ceremonies include the Saptapadi (that is, the taking of seven steps by the bridegroom and the bride jointly before the sacred fire), the marriage becomes complete and binding when the seventh step is taken."


The performance of marriage is complete with 7th step taken by the couple before holy fire,so saptapadi is most important  customary rite recognized by Vedic customs as well as codified Hindu Law.

  • The merely wearing Mangalsutra or Sindur on forehead does not constitute legally accepted marriage,if other rites like saptapadi before holy fire were not performed.but Homa or Kanyadhan is not obligatory in Hindu marriage act.
Important case laws :

  • "Under the Hindu system of law, clear proof of usage will outweigh the written text of law."Collector of Madura v Mootoo Ramalinga.


  • If essential ceremony like saptapadi is not perfomed ,such marriage is not legally accepted-Shanti Dev Barma v. Kanchan Prawa AIR 1991 SC 816.

  • Bhrama form of marriage not essential after the enactment of Hindu Marriage Act, for valid Hindu Marriage  according to A P High Court  in Ramlal Agarwal v. Shantadevi AIR 1999 AP 251.

  •  Custom permit a sudra to become sanyasi-Krishna Singh V Mathura Ahir 1980 SC707 ,1980 AIILJ 299

  • Udiki Marriages for widows amongst Munnuru  kapus community upheld .not to be proved-Malakayya And Anr. vs Avait Bhommayya And Anr.,AIR 1971 AP 270,1971 1 Anwr 143 ;Serai Udiki marriage among  Pancha- masal Lingayats ,proof unnecessary-Shakuntala Bai&Anr.V. Kulkarni&Anr.1989 AIR 1359, 989 SCR  (2)     70,  1989 SCC  (2) 526  , JT 1989 (1)    607,1989 SCALE  (1)737.

  • Essential ceremonies must be proved for allegation of second marriage- Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande&Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr ,1965 AIR 1564, 1965 SCR (2) 837.
  • A distinct community called Dudekulas consist of Mohammedans or Hindus,Governed by Hindu Law-Dudekulas belongs to Cuddapah district of A.P,who were originally Hindus but some generations ago began to adopt certain usages of Muslims so far as marriage and some social customs in general and they have been living as joint families following the incidents of Hindu families and customs-Rosanna v. Subbanna, ILR (1970) A.P. 1010
  • The taking of seven steps by the bride and the bride-groom together before the nuptial fire and the performance of 'nuptial homa' are the two essential ceremonies of a Hindu marriage. The ceremony known as 'Kushandika' is associated with 'nuptial homa' and the performance of a Sanskar. The evidence conclusively shows that at the time of performance of 'Kushandika' on the following morning both the ceremony of Saptapadi Gaman as well as the performance of homa had been done together and that the marriage became complete and binding between the parties-Rabindra Nath Dutta vs The State ,AIR 1969 Cal 55, 1969 CriLJ 164
  •  Definition of wife defined :"Whether a marriage performed according to customary rites and ceremonies, without strictly fulfilling the requisites of Section 7(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, or any other personal law would entitle the woman to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.? "We are of the opinion that a broad and expansive interpretation should be given to the term ‘wife’ to include even those cases where a man and woman have been living together as husband and wife for a reasonably long period of time, and strict proof of marriage should not be a pre-condition for maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C, so as to fulfil the true spirit and essence of the beneficial provision of maintenance under Section 125."-G.S. Singhvi.J.&Ashok Kumar Ganguly in Chanmuniya v Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha,(2011) 1 SCC 141 In this case ,the Additional Solitor General told Supreme Court that "use of word  keep one-night stand’ sexist, derogatory".

  • The Custom among Kammas of A.P that presents [pasupukumkuma] given to bridegroom by bride people shall be returned to them in the event of the bride dying issue less-intestate is established beyound doubt -N. Venkata Subba Rao v. Tummala Bhujangayya 1960 (1) An.WR 215.

  • The Custom,wife to get back dowry from estranged husband is valid -Venkateshwara Rao V Ganga bhavani ILR 1976 AP 26
 References :
  • Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law-John Duncan Martin Derrett


Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The concept of Hindu marriage

The concept of Hindu marriage:


Ancient Hindu Law&Marriage


The institution of marriage is as old as Rig Vedic and was given importance in Veda's,the marriage in Hindu philosophy is holy and scared union.

Marriage is one of 16 samaskara's  as propounded by Veda Vysa,it is stated that Sudra has only one samaskara ,that is marriage.

One of the important stage of Hindu man's  life is  called Grihastha or married man [like Brahmacharya-Student,Grihastha-Household life ,Vanaprastha- Retired life , Sanyasa: Renounced ].

The purpose of marriage is not to beget children or sexual fulfillment ,but also to perform holy ceremonies ,Hindu wife is called 'Ardhangini' one half of man[Manu said "the man's personality is incomplete unless he gets wife",husband can not perform religious ceremonies without presence of wife[Sri Rama used Sita statue,in her absence in Yagna]

The married women is given utmost importance in Hindu society,ironically ,widow or single women&divorcee [even widow re-marriage prohibited]are not given much importance during certain Hindu ceremonies,which lead to mass social movements lead by Raja Rammohan Roy,Dayanand Saraswathi,Eshwarchand Vidhya sagar.


The gotra and surname of wife changes, as she will be regarded as  family member of husband.

The Ancient Hindu law allowed polygamy[under certain conditions]but monogamy was prohibited , but Drupadi case of marrying five men [Panch Pandavas]was an exception to the rule.

There was no provision for divorce in ancient Hindu law as marriage was performed by chanting holy hymns [Mantra's].The wife leaves father's house for ever and become a member of husband's familiy for generations, the marriage is   for seven generations.

In ancient Hindu law ,the offences of against marriage like Adultery was regarded as sin and wrongdoers were punished as well as ostracized from the society ,even prohibited to participate in social activities.The inter-caste marriage  or [same]sagotra marriage  was strictly prohibited in ancient Hindu law.

Secular Hindu Law : 

The Hindu code bill was introduce for the first time during interim-parliament session by Law Minister Dr.B.R Ambedkar ,but there was no progress as Dr Ambedkar resigned from the Ministry.After first general election [1952] ,four acts into existence during year 1955-1956.
  1. Hindu Marriage Act ,1955.
  2. Hindu Succession Act ,1956
  3. Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act ,1956
  4. Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act,1956    

Conditions for Valid Hindu Marriage under Hindu Marriage Act ,1955:

Sec-5:Conditions for a Hindu marriage-A marriage may be solemnized between any two Hindus,if the following conditions are fulfillled,namely-

(i)Neither party has a spouse living at the time of marriage;

(ii)At the time of marriage, neither party,

(a)Is incapable of giving a valid consent to it in consequence of unsoundness of mind; or

(b)Though capable of giving a valid consent, has been suffering from mental disorder of such a kind or to such an extent as to be unfit for marriage and the procreation of children; or

(c)Has been subject to recurrent attacks of insanity;

(iii)The bridegroom has completed the age of [twenty-one years] and the bride, the age of [eighteen years] at the time of marriage;

(iv)The parties are not within the degrees of prohibited relationship unless the custom or usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two;

(v)The parties are not sapindas of each other, unless the custom or usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two.

   

Reference :
  • Kane,P.V.(1973),History of DharmaŚãstra,Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental research Institute.
  • Mulla -Hindu Law

Monday, April 9, 2012

The Concept of Hinduism,Hindu Marriage&its Essential Ceremonies

The Concept of Hinduism,Hindu Marriage&its Essential Ceremonies:

Series of Posts on Hindu Law

  • The concept of Hinduism.
  • Hindu Marriage.
  • Essentials of Hindu marriage.
  • The divorce and maintenance under Hindu Marriage Act .

Who is an Hindu ? What are definitions of Hindu or Hinduism?
  • The word 'Hindu' is derived from the Sanskrit word 'Sindhu', It was first mentioned in the Rig Veda.

  • Hinduism is not religion "way of life" [S.C] ,it is not institutionalized religion or no religious central authority exists for Hinduism like Vatican church.
  • According Section 2 Hindu Marriage Act 1956[Legal definition of "Hindu"]
(a) to any person who is a Hindu by religion in any of its forms and developments, including a Virashaiva, a Lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj,(b) to any person who is a Buddhist, Jain or Sikh by religion, and“(c) to any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion”

  • The Indian constitution does not define word 'Hinduism' includes a Virashaiva,Lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj.
  • It is well accepted that the word 'Hindu' derived from Sindhu river or Indus [ NW frontier province / Punjab, now in Pakistan] ,the Persians used to pronounced Sindhu as Hindu,basically Aryans, who settled in Indus Valley were also called as Hindus.

  • Hinduism is world oldest living religion ,as old as Harappan period (5500–2600BCE).The epics s Ramayana and Mahabharata were written roughly from 500–100BCE.

  • It has third largest followers after Christianity and Islam .
  • The Arabic term al-Hind referring to the land of the people ,who live across river Indus.

  • " to many Hinduism seems to be a name without any content. Is it a museum of beliefs, a medley or rites, or a mere map, a geographical expression" in "The Hindu View of Life" by Dr. S Radhakrishnan,

  • Hinduism is often referred to as Sanatana Dharma (सनातन धम) by its practitioners,a Sanskrit phrase meaning "the eternal law".
  • Sources of Hindu Philosophy includes,Vedas[divine revelations sruti,four Veda's-Rigveda,Yajurveda&Sama veda],smriti[Laws of Manu],Upanishads,Purana's and Itihasa.

  • Mahabharata and Ramayana are considered holy epics in Hinduism. [500–100BCE]

  • Sikhism,Jainism,Buddhism are off-shoots Hinduism are governed by Hindu Law.

  • Hinduism believes every aspect of life holy, the marriage is one of the Sixteen Samskaras[Samaskaras propounded by Veda vysa holds important other 's sages theory],which Hindu's believe sacrament or religious duty.

  • "When we think of the Hindu religion, unlike other religions in the world, the Hindu religion does not claim any one prophet; it does not worship any one god; it does not subscribe to any one dogma; it does not believe in any one philosophic concept; it does not follow any one set of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not appear to satisfy the narrow traditional features of any religion or creed. It may broadly be described as a way of life and nothing more."-Chief Justice P. B. Gajendragadkar.

  • "Acceptance of the Vedas with reverence; recognition of the fact that the means or ways to salvation are diverse; and the realization of the truth that the number of gods to be worshipped is large, that indeed is the distinguishing feature of Hindu religion." -Bal Gangadhar Tilak

  • A diverse body of religion, philosophy, and cultural practice native to and predominant in India, characterized by a belief in reincarnation and a supreme being of many forms and natures, by the view that opposing theories are aspects of one eternal truth, and by a desire for liberation from earthly evils-The Free Dictionary.

  • "Hinduism is practiced primarily in India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. It is a diverse family of devotional and ascetic cults and philosophical schools, all sharing a belief in reincarnation and involving the worship of one or more of a large pantheon of gods and goddesses, including Shiva and Vishnu (incarnate as Rama and Krishna), Kali, Durga, Parvati, and Ganesh. Hindu society was traditionally based on a caste system"-2012,Oxford University Press.




Supreme Court &H.C Judgements &Definition of Hinduism :
  • Gopal Narhar Safray v. Hanmanl Ganesh Safray (1879) I.L.R. 3 Bom. 273,

    Lingayats founded by Basava [12th century] believes only one God, Siva, and reject the other two persons of the Hindu Triad[Brahma&Vishnu]They reverence the Vedas, but disregard the later commentaries on which the Brahmans rely.Their faith purports to be the primitive Hindu faith, cleared of all priestly mysticism.Lingayats are not Hindus in religion because they are no image worshipers.

    The court held Lingayats are Hindus ,they have been subject to Hindu law as applied to Shudras.There is no other special law applicable to them



    • Nalinaksha Majhi v. Rajanikania Das Mohanta (1931) I.L.R. 58 Cal. 1392.
      It was held that under the Bengal School of the Hindu law of inheritance, a Vaishnava of whatever class was entitled to inherit from an ancestor who professed the orthodox Hindu creed and that a person of Vaishnava faith does not renounce the Hindu religion and continues to be a Hindu and professes Hindu religion in his own way, and though he may have seceded from orthodox Hinduism, as Lutherans did from the orthodox Catholic Church, he does not go out of the pale of Hinduism"

      • Bhatinda v. State of Punjab [AIR 1971 S C 1731] &DAV College, Jullundur v. State of Punjab [AIR 1971 S C 1737]

      "even if [institute] established by Arya Samaj, which is merely a part of the Hindu religion, cannot be held to be an institution established by a minority community so as to qualify for protection under Article 30 of the Constitution of India"-Arya Samaj is part of Hinduism ,no separate law exists for Arya Samajis .


      • Acharya Jagdishwaranand Avadhuta, etc. VS. Commissioner of Police, Calcutta & Anr. [1984 1 SCR 447]
      "Whether protection of Arts. 25 and 26 available to Ananda Marga-A socio-Spiritual organisation; No, Ananda Marga is not a separate religion but a religious denomination. Performance of Tandava dance in procession in public streets not an essential religious rite of Ananda Marga."

      • Brahmachari Sidheswar Shai & Others v. State of West Bengal [AIR 1995 S C 2089]
      "Sri Rama Krishna Mission found by Swamy Vivekanad is not separate religion &its institutes can not claim minority status under Article 30" It is well known Sri Rama Krishna was worshiper of Goddess Kali of Kalighath.


      • Commissioner Of Endowments, vs All India Sai Seva Samaj on 19 October, 2001,A.P High Court Special Bench -Ref.case:2001 (6) ALD 747, 2001 (6) ALT 539:[S Sinha, G Raghuram, V Rao]


        "Sai temples are also Hindu temples, Endowment Act is applicable to Shiridi Sai Baba Temples " "can not be treated parallel to Kabir Panth."

        • The State Of Bombay vs Shastri Yagna Purushadasji on 3 October, 1958 (1959) 61 BOMLR 700

        Swaminarayan temple at Ahmedabad and the temples subordinate there to were Hindu religious institutions within the meaning of Article 25(2)(b) of the Constitution.

        Swaminarayan Sampradaya[Vaishava sect] is not a different religion from Hinduism.



        References :



        Judgements :




        Saturday, March 31, 2012

        What is Civil Marriage ?

        What is Civil Marriage ?

        The meaning of marriage is 'state being united to person' as 'husband' or 'wife'.

         
        Civil Marriage &Customary Marriage :   
        There are two kinds of marriage performed in India;
        • The customary marriage 
        • The non-customary marriage i,e Civil Marriage.

        The customary marriage ceremony is performed by following age-old customs,&traditions practiced since time memorial   like Mangalasutradharan,saptapadhi ,Kanya Dhan or Nikah or exchange of rings in the church.

        The Customary marriages are governed by respective  customary religious laws viz Hindu law for Hindus/Muslim law for Muslims  /Christian law for Christian etc.

        The Civil Marriage is performed through civil ceremony and is governed by"The Special Marriage Act,1954".

        Any person ,irrespective of religion or caste or region can get married under Special Marriage Act i.e inter-caste or inter-religious are recognized under the Special Marriage Act.
        Any dispute related to inter-caste or anti-religious  marriage ,Special Marriage act applies. 


        The primary conditions include :
        • Both bride&bridegroom should be of Marriageable age :girl/bride should be 18 yrs and boy /bridegroom should be 21 

        • There should be valid consent.

        • They should not fall under degree of prohibited relationship.

        • Only Unmarried or previous marriage should have been dissolved legally. 

        Procedure laid down in SM Act:


        1. A Notice of intended marriage by parties/partners in a prescribed format ,as given in the second schedule of S.M Act.
        2. Must have resided in the place proceeding date, on the date of notice.
        3. Such notice should be affixed on the notice board for intended marriage for any objections.
        4. Notice book to be maintained by marriage officer for public inspection.
        5. If partners are not residing within local limits of district marriage registrar office,District marriage officer will transmit the notice to concerned district marriage district officer ,where parties residing.
        6. Any Person/persons may file objection to the intended marriage before expiry of 30 days from the date of notice,if any conditions are violated as laid down in the above said act.  
        7. The Marriage officer shall dispose of said objections after hearing both parties,may uphold or refuse to register the marriage.
        8. Aggrieved party can approach concerned District Marriage Officer for an appeal against refusal of registration of marriage. 
        9. Divorcee should attach a copy of divorce decree. 
        10. Three witnesses and age proof [SSC certificate]
        11. On the date of intended marriage,both parties will sign register maintained by M.O along with two witnesses. and the certificate of Marriage will be issued by M.O to the couple.Hence ,the marriage will become legal.

        The registration of customary marriage is compulsory ,married couple can approach nearest Marriage Officer along with wedding invitation card,photo's and witnesses for registration of customary marriage.However,in the event of any dispute in customary marriage,the concerned  marriage act applies [HM Act or Muslim law or Christian law]     
         
        Many young educated couples opting for love marriage,they are solemnizing it under Special Marriage as they come from different religious and caste background. 


        References :

        Sunday, March 25, 2012

        The Concept of Approver&Grant of pardon to an accomplice

        The Concept of Approver&Grant of pardon to an accomplice:


        We often hear in media in high profile cases or scams ,one of the accused has agreed to be approver,but fundamental principles involved in the concept must be understood thoroughly by all lawyers/layman by  studying the relevant provisions in Criminal Procedure and Evidence act along with relevant case laws.


        The conviction based on approver's evidence is legal valid &sustainable in India

        Fundamental principles -Approver &Grant of Pardon : 

        • There must be trial


        • Guilty of accused is not proved


        • Accused/accomplice agree to be approver ,there must be agreement to be approver for the grant of pardon provided he testifies in court about the crime. 


        • The approver becomes witness,the moment pardon tendered by court ,he is discharged from the case[ A.J. Peiris v. State of Madras (AIR 1954 SC 616)


        • If accused violate terms,there will be no question of pardon.[State v. Hiralal Girdharilal Kothari (AIR 1960 SC 360)]


        • The power to grant pardon carries with it the right to impose a condition limiting the operation of such a pardon[State (Delhi Administration) v. Jagjit Singh (1989 Supp (2) SCC 770)]


        • The grant of pardon to approver is based on principles of public policy and public interest -Karuppa Servai v.Kundaru AIR 1952 Mad 833: (1953 Crl.L.J. 45)


        • Right to detain -In Mukesh Ramchandra Reddy, 1958 Cri.L.J.  343, the A. P High Court interpreted the word "shall" in the said provisions"as primarily obligatory and casting a duty on the Court to detain an accused to whom pardon has been tendered."


        • Approver shall not be released until the decision of the case- A. L. Mehra v. State AIR 1958 Punj 72: (1958 Cri.LJ 413)


        • Approver can be released on bail,if approver’s evidence was recorded-Santosh  Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra, (2009) SCC 498.

        The Definition of Accomplice under Evidence Act 1872 


        According to Section 113  accomplice is a guilty associate or partner in crime who has connection or relationship with criminal act that he or she be implicated along with the principal offenders or offender.
        • He can be called abettor 
        • Person assisted offender in concealing the crime 
        • An approver in crime 
        • One who has received the stolen property  or contraband material.
        • Even women in Adultery cases can be called accomplice ,but can not be prosecuted by existing provisions of law,Justice Malimath committee recommended the punishment for women in Adultery cases.
        Types of Accomplice :

        • Accomplice before fact-Guilty even before committing crime ,an approver is accomplice before fact
        • Accomplice after fact-is no way connected with alleged crime or offence,but he has received stolen property or an receiver.

        Evidential Value of Accomplice under Indian Evidence Act 1872:

        • As per section 133 of accomplice shall be competent witness against accused ,conviction not bad in law. 


        • There is contradictory provision exists in Indian Evidence in section  114 which says" accomplice evidence unworthy  unless corroborated by material particulars."
        The conviction based on accomplice  evidence sustains under Indian law.It is settled law that section 133 prevails over section 114[K. Hasheem V State of Tamil Nadu 2005(1)SCC 237]


        Grant of pardon to an accomplice& criminal procedure code 1973 ;

        • Section 306-308 deal with tender of pardon to accomplice.  

        • Section 306-307 deals with  tender of pardon&power to direct tender of pardon .

        • Section 308- deals with trial of persons not complying with conditions of a tender of pardon 
         

        Section 306 of Cr.Pc 1973 deals with Tender of pardon to accomplice;
        "(1) With a view to obtaining the evidence of any person supposed to have been directly or indirectly concerned in or privy to an offence to which this section applies, the Chief Judicial Magistrate or a Metropolitan Magistrate at any stage of the investigation or inquiry into, or the trial of, the offence, and the Magistrate of the first class inquiring into or trying the offence, at any, stage of the inquiry or trial, may tender a pardon to such person on condition of his making a full and true disclosure of the whole of the circumstances within his knowledge relative to the offence and to every other person concerned, whether as principal or abettor, in the commission thereof."

        (2) This section applies to-

        (a) Any offence triable exclusively by the Court of Session or by the Court of a Special Judge appointed under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 (46 of 1952).

        (b) Any offence punishable with imprisonment, which may extend to seven years or with a more severe sentence.

        (3) Every Magistrate who tenders a pardon under sub-section (1) shall record-

        (a) His reasons for so doing;

        (b) Whether the tender was or was not accepted by the person to whom it was made,

        and shall, on application made by the accused, furnish him with a copy of such record free of cost.

        (4) Every person accepting a tender of pardon made under sub-section (1)-

        (a) Shall be examined as a witness in the court of the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence and in the subsequent trial, if any;

        (b) Shall, unless he is already on bail, be detained in custody until the termination of the trial.

        (5) Where a person has accepted a tender of pardon made under sub-section (1) and has, been examined under sub-section (4), the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence shall, without making any further inquiry in the case.

        (a) Commit it for trial-

        (i) To the Court of Session if the offence is triable exclusively by that court or if the Magistrate taking cognizance is the Chief Judicial Magistrate;

        (ii) To a court of Special Judge appointed under the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1952 (46 of 1952), if the offence is triable exclusively by that court;

        (b) In any other case, make over the case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate who shall try the case himself.

        At any time after commitment of a case but before Judgment is passed, the court to which the commitment is made may, with a view, to obtaining at the trial the evidence of any person supposed to have been directly or indirectly concerned in, or privy to, any such offence, tender a pardon on the same condition to such person.
         
        Bangaru Laxman v. State, (2012) 1 SCC 500

        On "Approver "&Purpose of grant of pardon " court  said "power is not to judge extent of culpability ofperson pardoned but to prevent failure of justice by not allowing offender to escape from lack of evidence"

        "a deeming provision is a legal fiction and an admission of non-existence of fact deemed - Hence, while interpreting a provision creating a legal fiction, court has to ascertain purpose for which fiction is created,  "-(2012) 1 SCC 500-D 

        Constitutional Validity of approver &Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case:

        The Gujarat High Court  dismissed a petition filed by suspended IPS officer Rajkumar Pandian and some other accused in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case, challenging the constitutional validity of a CrPC section 306 ,related to giving pardon to an accused one of accused 'Amin' moved the special CBI court seeking pardon and turning an approver in the 2005 episode

        A Division Bench of justices Jayant Patel & H B Antani rejected the plea with an observation that "section 306 of CrPC, read with principles of natural justice and provisions of the Constitution,does not cause prejudice to the fundamental rights of the accused"



        Paritala Ravindra murder case-K. Ram Mohan Reddy vs The State Of AP : 2010

         Sri Justice  Samudrala  Govinddarajulu said :"a case triable by a Magistrate is not in a way worse than a case exclusively triable by a Court of Session, in relation to gravity of the offences involved. In a case triable by the Magistrate, Section 306(4)(b) Cr.P.C., contemplates detaining the person accepting tender of pardon in custody until termination of trial, it cannot be said that the law intended to release the accused from custody even before termination of trial in a Sessions Case where tender of pardon was accepted by the accused in a Sessions Court after committal of the case. Therefore, on proper interpretation of Sections 306 and 307 Cr.P.C., provision under Section 306(4)(b) Cr.P.C has to be made applicable to a case arising under Section 307 Cr.P.C also"

        Sankararaman Murder [2004 Case] - 2011

        Sankararaman murder case ,Kanchi seer Jayendra Saraswathi is the main accused in 2004 murder case ,In 2011, December 14,A Division Bench of Chennai High Court,Justices C Nagappan and T Sudanthiram, said " according to section 306 (4) CrPC, a person accepting pardon under sub-section (1) of the section had to be detained in custody until termination of the trial, unless the person was already on bail"


        Abu Salem Case :
        State of  Maharastra  V Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum  Ansari & Ors  (JT 2010 (11) SC 65 ,2010(10) SCALE ,514 2010 AIR(SCW) 6077,(2010) 10 SCC 179.


        Question : "whether, the accused has a right to cross examine an accomplice who has been tendered in evidence by the prosecution as approver but later on pardon tendered to him was withdrawn on a certificate of the Public Prosecutor under Section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, `Cr.P.C.') and he (approver) has not been further examined by the prosecution as its witness." 


         Held :We have referred to the aforesaid provisions of the Evidence Act, Cr.P.C. and Constitution to indicate that none of these provisions militates against the proposition that a pardon granted to an  accomplice under Section 306 or 307 Cr.P.C. protects him from prosecution and he becomes  witness for prosecution but on forfeiture of such  pardon, he is relegated to the position of an  accused and his evidence is rendered useless for the purposes of the trial of the co- accused. He  cannot be compelled to be a witness. There is no question of such person being further examined  for the prosecution and, therefore, no occasion arises for the defence to cross examine him" 


        Emaar township case[A.P]-CBI orderd by A.P High Court :


        Stylish Homes director T. Ranga Rao, who has turned an approver&grant of pardon in the case by filing an application uner Cr.PC  306 and already got an anticipatory bail in the above case.
        In this case ,Emaar and its Indian associates allegedly diluted the equity of APIIC to six percent, causing huge losses to the public exchequer.









        It is settled law the conviction based on accomplice/approver's evidence sustains/prevails.

        References :
        1. http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/356159/ 
        2. http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=699112 
        3. http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_sankararaman-murder-hc-dismisses-plea-seeking-release-of-accused_1626333
        4.  http://delhicourts.nic.in/DEC%2011/Bangaru%20Laxman%20Vs.%20State.pdf
        5. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-01-25/india/30662735_1_emaar-apiic-cbi-cases-emaar-hills-township-project

        Total Pageviews

        Blogadda

        BLOGGED

        Powered By Blogger

        LAW AND SOCIETY